Folsom, (and anyone else that cares to chime in...),
Which makes me wonder- what are my amp’s meters telling me? IF the specs are correct for both the 88 db efficient and the Spatials at 94 db, I would think the SPL output would be dramatically different. I don’t know a lot, but I do know that every 3 db increase in SPL needs double the amplifier power.
I am acutely aware of, or at least pay attention to, these things because I use a relatively low power (30 wpc) amplifier. According to those in the know, my amp will drive very low impedance loads. Could this in some way affect what I’m seeing on the amp meters?
Regarding the 3-way large bookshelf, Stereophile’s measurements indicated that there was an impedance dip that would indicate using an amp that was comfortable driving 4 ohm loads. That might explain the high meter output on the amp. However...
Another online site that performs measurements found the floorstander with 88 db sensitivity had an even more challenging impedance dip on a few levels. And yet, it performed admirably with my thoroughly unscientific SPL meter measurements vs amp output meters. MUCH more SPL output vs amp meter levels.
As I write this, I am realizing that I did not note the exact levels of the rotary volume knob on the amp. This probably also plays into this in some manner. An offhand observation at best- the 88db floorstander probably was a tick higher on the actual volume knob for a given SPL vs the Spatials, though I cannot verify that.
Lastly, I am being deliberately vague on speaker brands, as I hope to have a small get together for a listen, and the floorstanders I’m currently enjoying are decidedly NOT a brand that would garner audiophile approval. I’ve been auditioning a few speakers, since a redo of my living is decidedly unfriendly to the Spatial aesthetic. (Not it’s audio- not that there’s anything wrong with that!)
Jim