Kudos to Sean Adams, founder of SlimDevices, for cooking up this funny and bang-on little audiophile argument map (pulled from a post at AA):
Audio Woo Checklist
You claim that an
( ) audible
( ) measurable
( ) hypothetical
improvement in sound quality can be attained by:
( ) upsampling
( ) increasing word size
( ) vibration dampening
( ) bi-wiring
( ) replacing the external power supply
( ) using a different lossless format
( ) decompressing on the server
( ) removing bits of metal from skull
( ) using ethernet instead of wireless
( ) inverting phase
( ) installing bigger connectors
( ) installing Black Gate caps
( ) installing ByBee filters
( ) installing hospital-grade AC jacks
( ) defragmenting the hard disk
( ) running older firmware
Your idea will not work. Specifically, it fails to account for:
( ) the placebo effect
( ) your ears honestly aren't that good
( ) your idea has already been thoroughly disproved
( ) modern DACs upsample anyway
( ) those products are pure snake oil
( ) lossless formats, by definition, are lossless
( ) those measurements are bogus
( ) sound travels much slower than you think
( ) electric signals travel much faster than you think
( ) that's not how binary arithmetic works
( ) that's not how TCP/IP works
( ) the Nyquist theorem
( ) the can't polish a turd theorem
( ) bits are bits
Your subsequent arguments will probably appeal in desperation to such esoterica as:
( ) jitter
( ) EMI
( ) thermal noise
( ) existentialism
( ) cosmic rays
And you will then change the subject to:
( ) theories are not the same as facts
( ) measurements don't tell everything
( ) not everyone is subject to the placebo effect
( ) blind testing is dumb
( ) you can't prove what I can't hear
( ) science isn't everything
Rather than engage in this tired discussion, I suggest exploring the following factors which are more likely to improve sound quality in your situation:
( ) room acoustics
( ) source material
( ) type of speakers
( ) speaker placement
( ) crossover points
( ) equalization
( ) Q-tips
Bob,
If Sean is still advocating the use of Q-Tips you should point him back to the legendary ear wax thread. #-o
http://www.audionervosa.com/index.php?topic=1932.0
Don't go there Tom or I will have to post another waxy picture [-( :nono:
I have some new info on that front, should I unlock it? ;) :duh
Quote from: BobM on April 01, 2010, 10:44:45 AM
Don't go there Tom or I will have to post another waxy picture [-( :nono:
:rofl: :shock: :rofl:
Quote from: richidoo on April 01, 2010, 10:47:22 AM
I have some new info on that front, should I unlock it? ;) :duh
As much fun as we has laughing at that thread I thought it also contained some very valuable information. If you have some new info, by all means bring it on. =P~
Interesting map. Thank you for that Bob. :thumb:
But,
Alcohol doesn't enter the equation. Most interesting.
That can mak teh msot diferenses sumtimez. And besides, I'm not as drunc as u cant pruuv. But wat...i need to defrag mi hardthing. Then ill bild sum base traps. itl be beter.
fhanks.
boob
hou cum spelceker has somane red lins????????
Quote from: richidoo on April 01, 2010, 10:47:22 AM
I have some new info on that front, should I unlock it? ;) :duh
I am begging you ----- please don't bring that thread back. :duh
Ken
Don't worry... [-(